Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure. / Sessa, Maurizio; Rasmussen, Daniel Bech; Jensen, Magnus Thorsten; Kragholm, Kristian; Torp-pedersen, Christian; Andersen, Morten.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 125, No. 7, 01.01.2020, p. 1069-1076.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sessa, M, Rasmussen, DB, Jensen, MT, Kragholm, K, Torp-pedersen, C & Andersen, M 2020, 'Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure', The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048

APA

Sessa, M., Rasmussen, D. B., Jensen, M. T., Kragholm, K., Torp-pedersen, C., & Andersen, M. (2020). Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure. The American Journal of Cardiology, 125(7), 1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048

Vancouver

Sessa M, Rasmussen DB, Jensen MT, Kragholm K, Torp-pedersen C, Andersen M. Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2020 Jan 1;125(7):1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048

Author

Sessa, Maurizio ; Rasmussen, Daniel Bech ; Jensen, Magnus Thorsten ; Kragholm, Kristian ; Torp-pedersen, Christian ; Andersen, Morten. / Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 2020 ; Vol. 125, No. 7. pp. 1069-1076.

Bibtex

@article{6951f4d0e74d484db61d9933f58968a4,
title = "Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure",
abstract = "This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.",
author = "Maurizio Sessa and Rasmussen, {Daniel Bech} and Jensen, {Magnus Thorsten} and Kristian Kragholm and Christian Torp-pedersen and Morten Andersen",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "1069--1076",
journal = "Am. J. Cardiol.",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metoprolol versus Carvedilol in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure

AU - Sessa, Maurizio

AU - Rasmussen, Daniel Bech

AU - Jensen, Magnus Thorsten

AU - Kragholm, Kristian

AU - Torp-pedersen, Christian

AU - Andersen, Morten

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.

AB - This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32000982

VL - 125

SP - 1069

EP - 1076

JO - Am. J. Cardiol.

JF - Am. J. Cardiol.

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 234080528