Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data: The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data : The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma. / Jakobsen, Lasse Hjort; Callréus, Torbjörn; Sessa, Maurizio; Jerkeman, Mats; Andersen, Morten; El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer.

In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2021, p. 514-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jakobsen, LH, Callréus, T, Sessa, M, Jerkeman, M, Andersen, M & El-Galaly, TC 2021, 'Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data: The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 514-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5195

APA

Jakobsen, L. H., Callréus, T., Sessa, M., Jerkeman, M., Andersen, M., & El-Galaly, T. C. (2021). Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data: The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 30(4), 514-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5195

Vancouver

Jakobsen LH, Callréus T, Sessa M, Jerkeman M, Andersen M, El-Galaly TC. Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data: The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2021;30(4):514-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5195

Author

Jakobsen, Lasse Hjort ; Callréus, Torbjörn ; Sessa, Maurizio ; Jerkeman, Mats ; Andersen, Morten ; El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer. / Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data : The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma. In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2021 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 514-519.

Bibtex

@article{71cc717f4bb844fab7e550cd724cf5f0,
title = "Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data: The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Personalized therapies are leading to an increasing number of marketing authorizations based on single-arm trials, which increases the demand for better post-authorization monitoring strategies. The aim of the present study was to estimate the power over time as data accrue in population-based registries for detecting deviations from the expected efficacy/safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy approved for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (RR-LBCL).METHODS: The number of real-world RR-LBCL patients was projected over time in a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million citizens using lymphoma registry data. For each scenario, we computed the power over time for detecting significant deviations in efficacy (1-year overall survival [1yOS]) when comparing to historical controls (SCHOLAR-1 study; 1yOS, 28%) and RR-LBCL patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy in a single-arm trial (ZUMA-1; 1yOS, 59%) as well as deviations in selected adverse events (grade ≥3 aphasia) from the ZUMA-1 trial. We assumed a 10% absolute deviation in 1yOS (efficacy) and a relative increase of 50% in grade ≥3 aphasia (safety).RESULTS: Assuming a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million, the accrual time needed to achieve 80% power for detecting a significant increase over the 1yOS reported in SCHOLAR-1 was 9, 4, and 3 years, respectively, while 80% power for detecting a significant decrease in 1yOS compared to ZUMA-1 required 10.5, 4.5, and 3 years of data accrual, respectively. However, corresponding estimates for aphasia were >20, 8, and 5 years, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Projections of the statistical power for detecting important deviations in efficacy/safety from that reported in pivotal clinical trials(s) provide critical information about the expected performance of post-authorization monitoring programs.",
author = "Jakobsen, {Lasse Hjort} and Torbj{\"o}rn Callr{\'e}us and Maurizio Sessa and Mats Jerkeman and Morten Andersen and El-Galaly, {Tarec Christoffer}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1002/pds.5195",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "514--519",
journal = "Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety",
issn = "1053-8569",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting deviations from the efficacy and safety results of single-arm trials using real-world data

T2 - The case of a CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma

AU - Jakobsen, Lasse Hjort

AU - Callréus, Torbjörn

AU - Sessa, Maurizio

AU - Jerkeman, Mats

AU - Andersen, Morten

AU - El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer

N1 - © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - PURPOSE: Personalized therapies are leading to an increasing number of marketing authorizations based on single-arm trials, which increases the demand for better post-authorization monitoring strategies. The aim of the present study was to estimate the power over time as data accrue in population-based registries for detecting deviations from the expected efficacy/safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy approved for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (RR-LBCL).METHODS: The number of real-world RR-LBCL patients was projected over time in a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million citizens using lymphoma registry data. For each scenario, we computed the power over time for detecting significant deviations in efficacy (1-year overall survival [1yOS]) when comparing to historical controls (SCHOLAR-1 study; 1yOS, 28%) and RR-LBCL patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy in a single-arm trial (ZUMA-1; 1yOS, 59%) as well as deviations in selected adverse events (grade ≥3 aphasia) from the ZUMA-1 trial. We assumed a 10% absolute deviation in 1yOS (efficacy) and a relative increase of 50% in grade ≥3 aphasia (safety).RESULTS: Assuming a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million, the accrual time needed to achieve 80% power for detecting a significant increase over the 1yOS reported in SCHOLAR-1 was 9, 4, and 3 years, respectively, while 80% power for detecting a significant decrease in 1yOS compared to ZUMA-1 required 10.5, 4.5, and 3 years of data accrual, respectively. However, corresponding estimates for aphasia were >20, 8, and 5 years, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Projections of the statistical power for detecting important deviations in efficacy/safety from that reported in pivotal clinical trials(s) provide critical information about the expected performance of post-authorization monitoring programs.

AB - PURPOSE: Personalized therapies are leading to an increasing number of marketing authorizations based on single-arm trials, which increases the demand for better post-authorization monitoring strategies. The aim of the present study was to estimate the power over time as data accrue in population-based registries for detecting deviations from the expected efficacy/safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy approved for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (RR-LBCL).METHODS: The number of real-world RR-LBCL patients was projected over time in a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million citizens using lymphoma registry data. For each scenario, we computed the power over time for detecting significant deviations in efficacy (1-year overall survival [1yOS]) when comparing to historical controls (SCHOLAR-1 study; 1yOS, 28%) and RR-LBCL patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy in a single-arm trial (ZUMA-1; 1yOS, 59%) as well as deviations in selected adverse events (grade ≥3 aphasia) from the ZUMA-1 trial. We assumed a 10% absolute deviation in 1yOS (efficacy) and a relative increase of 50% in grade ≥3 aphasia (safety).RESULTS: Assuming a general population of 5, 15, and 25 million, the accrual time needed to achieve 80% power for detecting a significant increase over the 1yOS reported in SCHOLAR-1 was 9, 4, and 3 years, respectively, while 80% power for detecting a significant decrease in 1yOS compared to ZUMA-1 required 10.5, 4.5, and 3 years of data accrual, respectively. However, corresponding estimates for aphasia were >20, 8, and 5 years, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Projections of the statistical power for detecting important deviations in efficacy/safety from that reported in pivotal clinical trials(s) provide critical information about the expected performance of post-authorization monitoring programs.

U2 - 10.1002/pds.5195

DO - 10.1002/pds.5195

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33432654

VL - 30

SP - 514

EP - 519

JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

SN - 1053-8569

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 256072988