Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations. / Papathanasiou, Theodoros; Strathe, Anders; Hooker, Andrew C; Lund, Trine Meldgaard; Overgaard, Rune Viig.

In: The AAPS Journal, Vol. 20, 64, 05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Papathanasiou, T, Strathe, A, Hooker, AC, Lund, TM & Overgaard, RV 2018, 'Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations', The AAPS Journal, vol. 20, 64. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5

APA

Papathanasiou, T., Strathe, A., Hooker, A. C., Lund, T. M., & Overgaard, R. V. (2018). Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations. The AAPS Journal, 20, [64]. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5

Vancouver

Papathanasiou T, Strathe A, Hooker AC, Lund TM, Overgaard RV. Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations. The AAPS Journal. 2018 May;20. 64. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5

Author

Papathanasiou, Theodoros ; Strathe, Anders ; Hooker, Andrew C ; Lund, Trine Meldgaard ; Overgaard, Rune Viig. / Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations. In: The AAPS Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 20.

Bibtex

@article{b11b4d9fd4b74d6faad464ec26405d6a,
title = "Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations",
abstract = "The exposure-response relationship of combinatory drug effects can be quantitatively described using pharmacodynamic interaction models, which can be used for the selection of optimal dose combinations. The aim of this simulation study was to evaluate the reliability of parameter estimates and the probability for accurate dose identification for various underlying exposure-response profiles, under a number of different phase II designs. An efficacy variable driven by the combined exposure of two theoretical compounds was simulated and model parameters were estimated using two different models, one estimating all parameters and one assuming that adequate previous knowledge for one drug is readily available. Estimation of all pharmacodynamic parameters under a realistic, in terms of sample size and study design, phase II trial, proved to be challenging. Inaccurate estimates were found in all exposure-response scenarios, except for situations where no pharmacodynamic interaction was present, with the drug potency and interaction parameters being the hardest to estimate. When previous knowledge of the exposure-response relationship of one of the monocomponents is available, such information should be utilized, as it enabled relevant improvements in parameter estimation and in correct dose identification. No general trends for classification of the performance of the tested study designs across different scenarios could be identified. This study shows that pharmacodynamic interactions models can be used for the exposure-response analysis of clinical endpoints especially when accompanied by appropriate dose selection in regard to the expected drug potencies and appropriate trial size and if information regarding the exposure-response profile of one monocomponent is available.",
author = "Theodoros Papathanasiou and Anders Strathe and Hooker, {Andrew C} and Lund, {Trine Meldgaard} and Overgaard, {Rune Viig}",
year = "2018",
month = may,
doi = "10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "A A P S Journal",
issn = "1550-7416",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of Exposure-Response Analyses for Clinical Dose-Ranging Studies of Drug Combinations

AU - Papathanasiou, Theodoros

AU - Strathe, Anders

AU - Hooker, Andrew C

AU - Lund, Trine Meldgaard

AU - Overgaard, Rune Viig

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - The exposure-response relationship of combinatory drug effects can be quantitatively described using pharmacodynamic interaction models, which can be used for the selection of optimal dose combinations. The aim of this simulation study was to evaluate the reliability of parameter estimates and the probability for accurate dose identification for various underlying exposure-response profiles, under a number of different phase II designs. An efficacy variable driven by the combined exposure of two theoretical compounds was simulated and model parameters were estimated using two different models, one estimating all parameters and one assuming that adequate previous knowledge for one drug is readily available. Estimation of all pharmacodynamic parameters under a realistic, in terms of sample size and study design, phase II trial, proved to be challenging. Inaccurate estimates were found in all exposure-response scenarios, except for situations where no pharmacodynamic interaction was present, with the drug potency and interaction parameters being the hardest to estimate. When previous knowledge of the exposure-response relationship of one of the monocomponents is available, such information should be utilized, as it enabled relevant improvements in parameter estimation and in correct dose identification. No general trends for classification of the performance of the tested study designs across different scenarios could be identified. This study shows that pharmacodynamic interactions models can be used for the exposure-response analysis of clinical endpoints especially when accompanied by appropriate dose selection in regard to the expected drug potencies and appropriate trial size and if information regarding the exposure-response profile of one monocomponent is available.

AB - The exposure-response relationship of combinatory drug effects can be quantitatively described using pharmacodynamic interaction models, which can be used for the selection of optimal dose combinations. The aim of this simulation study was to evaluate the reliability of parameter estimates and the probability for accurate dose identification for various underlying exposure-response profiles, under a number of different phase II designs. An efficacy variable driven by the combined exposure of two theoretical compounds was simulated and model parameters were estimated using two different models, one estimating all parameters and one assuming that adequate previous knowledge for one drug is readily available. Estimation of all pharmacodynamic parameters under a realistic, in terms of sample size and study design, phase II trial, proved to be challenging. Inaccurate estimates were found in all exposure-response scenarios, except for situations where no pharmacodynamic interaction was present, with the drug potency and interaction parameters being the hardest to estimate. When previous knowledge of the exposure-response relationship of one of the monocomponents is available, such information should be utilized, as it enabled relevant improvements in parameter estimation and in correct dose identification. No general trends for classification of the performance of the tested study designs across different scenarios could be identified. This study shows that pharmacodynamic interactions models can be used for the exposure-response analysis of clinical endpoints especially when accompanied by appropriate dose selection in regard to the expected drug potencies and appropriate trial size and if information regarding the exposure-response profile of one monocomponent is available.

U2 - 10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5

DO - 10.1208/s12248-018-0226-5

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29687351

VL - 20

JO - A A P S Journal

JF - A A P S Journal

SN - 1550-7416

M1 - 64

ER -

ID: 199378620