Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers. / Ladebo, Louise; Foster, David J.R.; Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.; Upton, Richard N.; Kongstad, Kenneth T.; Drewes, Asbjørn M.; Christrup, Lona L.; Olesen, Anne E.

In: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Vol. 126, No. 3, 2020, p. 263-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ladebo, L, Foster, DJR, Abuhelwa, AY, Upton, RN, Kongstad, KT, Drewes, AM, Christrup, LL & Olesen, AE 2020, 'Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers', Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13330

APA

Ladebo, L., Foster, D. J. R., Abuhelwa, A. Y., Upton, R. N., Kongstad, K. T., Drewes, A. M., Christrup, L. L., & Olesen, A. E. (2020). Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 126(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13330

Vancouver

Ladebo L, Foster DJR, Abuhelwa AY, Upton RN, Kongstad KT, Drewes AM et al. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2020;126(3):263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13330

Author

Ladebo, Louise ; Foster, David J.R. ; Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y. ; Upton, Richard N. ; Kongstad, Kenneth T. ; Drewes, Asbjørn M. ; Christrup, Lona L. ; Olesen, Anne E. / Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers. In: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2020 ; Vol. 126, No. 3. pp. 263-276.

Bibtex

@article{a059fb20e0154ebea4515ddd33cd765b,
title = "Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers",
abstract = "Oral controlled-release formulations are playing an ever-increasing role in opioid therapy; however, little is known about their influence on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study aim was to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics of two controlled-release tablet formulations and a liquid formulation of oxycodone in healthy, opioid-na{\"i}ve volunteers, which can serve as a reference for future patient studies. A semi-double-blinded, three-way crossover study was conducted, with fifteen healthy volunteers receiving two differently designed 20 mg monophasic controlled-release oxycodone tablets and 10 mg oral solution oxycodone in a randomized order. Venous plasma concentrations and pupil diameter were determined pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.33, 2.66, 3, 3.33, 3.66, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hour post-dose. Oxycodone pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The controlled-release formulations had an absorption lag of 0.23 hour and a slower absorption rate constant (kaCR = 0.19 hour-1) compared to the oral solution (kaSOL = 0.94 hour-1). Effects on pupil diameter were delayed relative to plasma (14 minutes half-life) for all formulations and were best described by a proportional Emax model. The plasma concentration of oxycodone at half-maximum effect was lower in males (31.1 μg/L) compared to females (52.8 μg/L; P <.001). The absorption profile of controlled-release oxycodone formulations provided a prolonged onset and offset of action compared to oral solution oxycodone. The controlled-release formulations showed no differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters suggesting that both may be used interchangeably in human beings with normal gastrointestinal function.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Oral controlled-release formulation, Oral solution, Oxycodone, Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling",
author = "Louise Ladebo and Foster, {David J.R.} and Abuhelwa, {Ahmad Y.} and Upton, {Richard N.} and Kongstad, {Kenneth T.} and Drewes, {Asbj{\o}rn M.} and Christrup, {Lona L.} and Olesen, {Anne E.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/bcpt.13330",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "263--276",
journal = "Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology",
issn = "1742-7835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers

AU - Ladebo, Louise

AU - Foster, David J.R.

AU - Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.

AU - Upton, Richard N.

AU - Kongstad, Kenneth T.

AU - Drewes, Asbjørn M.

AU - Christrup, Lona L.

AU - Olesen, Anne E.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Oral controlled-release formulations are playing an ever-increasing role in opioid therapy; however, little is known about their influence on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study aim was to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics of two controlled-release tablet formulations and a liquid formulation of oxycodone in healthy, opioid-naïve volunteers, which can serve as a reference for future patient studies. A semi-double-blinded, three-way crossover study was conducted, with fifteen healthy volunteers receiving two differently designed 20 mg monophasic controlled-release oxycodone tablets and 10 mg oral solution oxycodone in a randomized order. Venous plasma concentrations and pupil diameter were determined pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.33, 2.66, 3, 3.33, 3.66, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hour post-dose. Oxycodone pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The controlled-release formulations had an absorption lag of 0.23 hour and a slower absorption rate constant (kaCR = 0.19 hour-1) compared to the oral solution (kaSOL = 0.94 hour-1). Effects on pupil diameter were delayed relative to plasma (14 minutes half-life) for all formulations and were best described by a proportional Emax model. The plasma concentration of oxycodone at half-maximum effect was lower in males (31.1 μg/L) compared to females (52.8 μg/L; P <.001). The absorption profile of controlled-release oxycodone formulations provided a prolonged onset and offset of action compared to oral solution oxycodone. The controlled-release formulations showed no differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters suggesting that both may be used interchangeably in human beings with normal gastrointestinal function.

AB - Oral controlled-release formulations are playing an ever-increasing role in opioid therapy; however, little is known about their influence on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study aim was to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics of two controlled-release tablet formulations and a liquid formulation of oxycodone in healthy, opioid-naïve volunteers, which can serve as a reference for future patient studies. A semi-double-blinded, three-way crossover study was conducted, with fifteen healthy volunteers receiving two differently designed 20 mg monophasic controlled-release oxycodone tablets and 10 mg oral solution oxycodone in a randomized order. Venous plasma concentrations and pupil diameter were determined pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.33, 2.66, 3, 3.33, 3.66, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hour post-dose. Oxycodone pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The controlled-release formulations had an absorption lag of 0.23 hour and a slower absorption rate constant (kaCR = 0.19 hour-1) compared to the oral solution (kaSOL = 0.94 hour-1). Effects on pupil diameter were delayed relative to plasma (14 minutes half-life) for all formulations and were best described by a proportional Emax model. The plasma concentration of oxycodone at half-maximum effect was lower in males (31.1 μg/L) compared to females (52.8 μg/L; P <.001). The absorption profile of controlled-release oxycodone formulations provided a prolonged onset and offset of action compared to oral solution oxycodone. The controlled-release formulations showed no differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters suggesting that both may be used interchangeably in human beings with normal gastrointestinal function.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Oral controlled-release formulation

KW - Oral solution

KW - Oxycodone

KW - Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling

U2 - 10.1111/bcpt.13330

DO - 10.1111/bcpt.13330

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31597014

AN - SCOPUS:85074670556

VL - 126

SP - 263

EP - 276

JO - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

JF - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

SN - 1742-7835

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 234564283